|
|
|
What's the resolution of your display? If you have more than one, pick the one with the highest value...
1/1: What's the resolution of your display? If you have more than one, pick the one with the highest value...
Other polls | 4,674 votes | 27 comments
reply
1280x1024 is what i voted for becuase that is what my studio display uses. All other times i am on my 12" with 1024x768.
1152 x 870
I'm probably the only person on the planet who actually uses that oddball 1152 x 870 resolution...it gives me pretty much the same size elements on my $cheap 17" monitor as 1024 x 768, but it gives me a little bit more space on the screen. It's especially nice when displaying VNC windows of 1024 x 768 screens.
1152 x 870
Me too! I use it on an old 17" CRT when using dual displays on my G4 iBook. The iBook, of course, uses 1024x768, which is just right for its screen size.
1152 x 870
Me too! I use 1152 x 870 on my eMac. I was surprised that it wasn't included in the list. Many desktop picture sites have that ratio as a download option.
1152 x 870
Mee too :) A second (17") monitor for both my 17" iMac 800MHz at work and for my iBook G4 at home. Pixel sizes in this resolution are about the same on the TFT and the CRT.
1152 x 870
For those that can remember, 1152x870 was the original fixed two page resolution used by the old black and white 21" displays from Apple. Which is what got me hooked on it and I still use it to this day J;-)
1152 x 870
I have no idea if this is a common resolution, but it is the best I can get on my SuperMatch 21" Sync on Green Display dating from 1993 ! Still happily using it with OS X on my G4 !
1152 x 870
Me too. I have a Radius and an Apple (both 17") and this seems to be the optimal resolution for me.
Triplets rock.
3x 1600x1200 on 19" Nokia 446PROs. :)
monitors
I have two displays - a 23" Apple Cinema (1st gen) at 1920x1200, and a 19" Samsung Syncmaster at 1280x1024. I occassionally wish for a little more room, but don't have room on my desk for a 3rd monitor or a larger replacement for either of the 2 I use.
1920 x 1440
As an Art Director I use 1920 x 1440 on both my LaCie Electro Blue iV 19" Why are not listed higher 4:3 resolutions ?
1920 x 1440
Because I didn't know about them? :). What are some of the other more common ones; I'll add them to the poll...
1920 x 1440
Theese are the resolutions listed on my displays preferences that are not listed here:
1344 x 1008 (weird)
For what it's worth, my girlfriend's powermac is running at 1344 x 1008 (at some phenomenal refresh rate, 102hz, I think?) on a 19" Dell monitor (near giveaway from her old job). I'd never run across that resolution before, but the display looks fantastic, sharp, flicker-free, and she likes it a lot (1024 x 768 was not enough real estate, 1280 x 1024 wasn't the right aspect ratio, and 1600 x 1200 made everything too small).
Lacie Displays [OT]
How do you like your Lacie disply? I've been looking into buying a 22 inch electron blue, but I haven't seen any good reviews. (Meaning the reviews were not well written, intelligent or thurough; not that they reflected poorly on the product)
Original Apple Cinema Display...
1600 X 1024... native resolution of the original Apple Cinema Display
Original Apple Cinema Display...
Same here -- a little surprised to see that resolution omitted in the poll...
1152 x 768
1152 x 768, the ol' TiBook resolution.
1152 x 768
Me too!
3800 x 2400
IBM 200 DPI
You work on that? Isn't OS X a bit small?
Can you really work on that or is this a joke? Cause 200dpi must be hard on the eyes with OSX - or are you already running OS X 10.5 Lion which scales all widgets to any resolution? :-)
Most People either using an iBook or 12" PB
From the looks of the poll results it seems most people are either using iBooks or 12" Powerbooks; kind of interesting.
Most People either using an iBook or 12" PB
or FP 15" G4 iMacs
1184 x 888
I use 1184 x 888 at 101 Hz refresh at millions of colors on my Samsung SyncMaster 700IFT. I reach this resolution through DisplayConfigX - an awesome app that lets you choose resolutions based on your monitor's actual abilities, rather than what Apple constrains us to.
17" PB - lame display
I have a 17" PB so Im limited to the terrible 1440x960. If only Apple would catch up with the current technology and bring out a PB with at least 1900x1600 (or whatever matches the aspect ratio), then finally if they can get the DPI up we can move past the font smoothing nonsense and have the text be as clear as XP. Its sad to see Apple lag behind so much on the display technology and the software to render fonts properly. Maybe they are held back by Adobe's font engine.
1920x1440 (CRT)
Presumably the 1920x option was for a widescreen LCD. I've got a 21" CRT running at 1920x1440 (through a KVM that *claims* to support "up to" 1600x1200).
other
1152 x 870 each on dual 22" monitors |
SearchFrom our Sponsor...Latest Mountain Lion HintsWhat's New:HintsNo new hintsComments last 2 daysLinks last 2 weeksNo recent new linksWhat's New in the Forums?
Hints by TopicNews from Macworld
From Our Sponsors |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Copyright © 2014 IDG Consumer & SMB (Privacy Policy) Contact Us All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners. |
Visit other IDG sites: |
|
|
|
Created this page in 0.06 seconds |
|