Submit Hint Search The Forums LinksStatsPollsHeadlinesRSS
14,000 hints and counting!

Click here to return to the 'Did you actually try to use Pixelmator in production before rating?' hint
The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. This site is not responsible for what they say.
Did you actually try to use Pixelmator in production before rating?
Authored by: alec kinnear on May 08, '08 11:48:46AM

Rob, before you rated Pixelmator 8/10 did you actually try to use it? I mean it looks good and demoes okay but folds completely under use.

Pixelmator is slow and crashy. Saving takes ages, files are huge. There's no Save for Web. I was unable to get any real work done, despite spending nearly a full day on Pixelmator over the course of a few days.

I so much wanted to replace Photoshop. I loathe Adobe's whole approach ($2200 for a single software seat). But Pixelmator won't do it. I wish the guys luck, but they are making claims which just don't hold up.

The whole core image approach is overrated. We have great multicore processors with 4 or 8 or more GB of RAM on board. Why are we offloading 2D to the 128/256/512 MB single core 700 MHz graphics card again?

WordPress SEO Secrets -

[ Reply to This | # ]