Submit Hint Search The Forums LinksStatsPollsHeadlinesRSS
14,000 hints and counting!


Click here to return to the 'JollysFastVNC - A speedy VNC client' hint
The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. This site is not responsible for what they say.
JollysFastVNC - A speedy VNC client
Authored by: sayler on Sep 05, '07 09:50:30AM

"Tried it connecting to a client's machine across a VPN.
I see no speed improvements over ChickenVNC. It's just choppier looking."

CotVNC has always seemed very CPU-limited -- even when on a LAN <-> LAN connection between two fast machines it felt pretty laggy (not to knock CotVNC -- in general I like it a lot).

Over a WAN VPN, you're probably bandwidth-limited. I've never used it, but a previous commenter talked about the Vine VNC server for OS X, which apparently support more types of encoding than the built-in VNC server.. If your remote machine is OS X you might give it a whirl? Better encodings can mean less bandwidth needed.



[ Reply to This | # ]
JollysFastVNC - A speedy VNC client
Authored by: robg on Sep 05, '07 12:32:05PM

Indeed, if you're seeing the same speed, then you're network-limited, not application-limited. I was testing over a gigabit internal network, just to insure that the network was *not* the bottleneck.

-rob.



[ Reply to This | # ]
JollysFastVNC - A speedy VNC client
Authored by: joshturse on Sep 05, '07 12:56:57PM

I have the same experience - it's actually slower than CotVNC with the built-in server over an SSH tunnel. I was blaming this on the number of colors - with CotVNC I can set the numbers of colors to thousands and couldn't find a way to do this in Jolly?

I will try both with Vine though, instead, as some of the other posts have recommended.



[ Reply to This | # ]