Submit Hint Search The Forums LinksStatsPollsHeadlinesRSS
14,000 hints and counting!


Click here to return to the 'Looking for poll ideas...' hint
The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. This site is not responsible for what they say.
Looking for poll ideas...
Authored by: ihelp-mac on Nov 16, '06 03:08:51PM

How about this?

How long till Apple licences out OSX to run on generic Intel PC's?

100 million unhappy, virus-infected PC users might want to know... :-)

At around (hypothetically) $300.xx bunded with an OEM copy of Win.XP,
that'd be THIRTY BILLION DOLLARS of instant cash-revenue to Apple
---the stockholders will say this is a WONDERFUL idea, financially....

Strategically...
---How long until Apple licenses OSX out to run natively on generic Intel hardware?:
• At Macworld 2007
• Coincident with official release of "Leopard"
• Ahead of release of Windows "Vista"
• Coincident with release of "Vista"
• One Year
• Two Years
• Three Years
• Maybe Someday
• Never

Hardware Implications, if Apple licenses OSX onto generic PC's:
• No impact on Apple hardware--we have the design/quality people want
• Apple goes "upscale"--a "Rolls Royce" build-to-order rich option...
• Apple stops development of CPU hardware and focuses on "rich media" for "home theatre" set-top environments.


---
BeSeeingYou...
David A. Lewis



[ Reply to This | # ]
*sigh*
Authored by: lionel77 on Nov 16, '06 05:56:06PM

I can't believe people still have the nerve to suggest this. I don't think there is a single Mac related web page where the "Apple would be so much more successful if they sold OS X for generic PCs" myth has not been debunked.

The two main reasons why this is A Bad Idea™ are:
- hugely increased development and testing costs for supporting a shitload of hardware configurations (some of very low quality)
- Apple would lose more profit in hardware sales than they would make through the additional OS licenses (even if the mac market share would tripple or so)



[ Reply to This | # ]