Submit Hint Search The Forums LinksStatsPollsHeadlinesRSS
14,000 hints and counting!


Umm....NO | 27 comments | Create New Account
Click here to return to the 'Umm....NO' hint
The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. This site is not responsible for what they say.
Umm....NO
Authored by: ibook on May 20, '02 07:31:55PM

Err, my iBook DOES have an AGP card.
I know the issues with how QE works. As far as I know there really is no reason why an AGP equipped 2001 iBook would not get a speed increase from QE, had QE been written to work with it. A G4 with a non-radeon AGP would probably NOT get a speed increase, but a G3 (even more so if it's the 500MHz model) would -- and even if the speed increase was marginal, load would be taken off the processor.
This is the point I'm trying to make. I don't expect my iBook to do more than it's capable of. All I expect is that the best use is made of the available hardware. I don't expect miracles -- and I don't understand why my expectations seem to be winding people up.

Sorry.



[ Reply to This | # ]
Umm....NO
Authored by: taikahn on May 21, '02 12:31:02AM

You made an example of QE being obsolete... you talked about a new OS version supporting only a 64x CD as an example of your CD being obsolete. The CD DRIVE IS NOT OBSOLETE... the proper example would be, the new OS can use a 64x but since you have a 32x it only runs at 32x.... that is a big difference from NOT WORKING AT ALL.

You proved your own argument wrong.



[ Reply to This | # ]
Your iBooks is just fine...
Authored by: marcinjeske on May 21, '02 02:09:58AM

Stop worrying... nobody is taking your iBook away.

1. Quartz Extreme takes advantage of unused hardware when it makes sense to do so... While we've already conjectured that AGP 2X is a limiting factor (to allow enough bandwidth to make QE efficient, I believe another bottleneck is memory. As was pointed out elsewhere, buffering an entire screen (1024 x 768 at 32 depth) takes about 3MB of memory. Now, looking just now at how many screenfuls of windows I have open, I'd estimate 5. Therefore, if QE works the way we think, my system would require approx. 15MB of video memory.

The recommended 32MB provides about 10 screenfuls... pretty decent.
But the 8MB which came in your iBook 2001 could only muster about two and a half. That pretty much makes it pointless, as it would only be useful when switching between a couple of visible windows... quite a minimalist windowing environment. Every performance tweak has trade-offs, and in this case, I think Apple decided that shuttling windows back and forth on the iBook 2001 slower bus, with little to show for, was not worth the effort.

Your iBook is fully supported by Mac OS X. Your hardware simply can't take advantage of some of the improvements. While such a situation is unfortunate, it is a necessary by-product of technological change. New hardware introduces new capabilities which older hardware can't match. And even in situations where newer features could be written for older technology, the benefits gained are so small or even negative, that the effort is a waste.

- Marcin (who is chugging away with Mac OS X on a beige G3, the oldest "fully supported" Mac OS X computer.)



[ Reply to This | # ]
You are STILL supported
Authored by: krove on May 21, '02 12:40:29PM

No one ever said your machine was not supported. You'll still enjoy the reported increases in "snappiness" without the use of Quartz Extreme.

Newer machines will be able to take advantage of this new technology. Get over it. You can't expect Apple to grandfather in every customer they have: the platform wouldn't go anywhere, as we'd be stuck waiting for everyone to catch up (which would of course never happen). The line had to be drawn somewhere (in this case they had no choice - the technology deemed that ONLY AGP 2x and great and 16MB and greater cards would be supported).

If it makes you feel better, I have seen that a plist exists to control which cards will and will not run QE. Try turning it on in your iBook and see where it gets you. Probably nowhere because this is not a conspiracy of planned obsolesence.



[ Reply to This | # ]
You are STILL supported
Authored by: radfordr on May 21, '02 04:20:00PM

I had an iBook on order when Steve Jobs made the Quartz announcement. I would not have bought if I had known but still had to take delivery of a machine after finding out that Apple was not optimizing its operating system for machines they were then delivering.

I have no problem with Apple making improvements but I do when Apple ships machines that are already obsolete. Let us see an upgrade kit, either from Apple or a third party, that doesn't void the warrantee so that we can get a current machine.



[ Reply to This | # ]
You are STILL supported
Authored by: krove on May 21, '02 07:03:01PM

Jaguar isn't even released yet! Until then, the "Apple shouldn't ship obsolete" argument is bunk.



[ Reply to This | # ]
You are STILL supported
Authored by: marcinjeske on May 22, '02 04:06:21AM

Apple is optimizing Mac OS X for your machine.

Your iBook just won't be able to take advantage of all the optimizations in Mac OS X.

If Apple optimizes something for AltiVec... the iBook does not benefit. If Apple creates a PCI card that makes running Carbon Apps faster... you are out of luck.

Please be clear on this... the features in Mac OS X (including optimization) whichan iBook can use are a subset of all features. At the speed technology is moving, any new computer will always be missing the latest technology...



[ Reply to This | # ]