|
|
Why Apple's Mail.
One of the main things: it's better handling all kind of messages, with pictures, music, whatever. I get lots of newsletters, and in Entourage was a real pain, some with half pictures, or no pictures at all, or "strange font behavior".
Why Apple's Mail.
Apple mail has a huge problem handling digest list messages. Or more accurately, it can not handle them in the same manner Eudora can. Eudora can be configured (simply check a box) to treat digest messages as a mailbox. By doing this, it makes it really easy to reply to a message. I myself don't subscribe to digest versions, but those that do aare doing themselves a dis-service by not using Eudora.
Why Apple's Mail.
Pine handles all sorts of messages, too. If there are pictures, or fancy HTML formatting, or music, or anything else, it tells me that they're there, and then doesn't display them.
Why Apple's Mail.
Pine? But pine has that silly editor that has all these fancy, get-in-your-way control-commands. Elm is really the way to go, with vi configured as the editor. Kids these days, "pine," pshaw. [tongue firmly in cheek]
Why Apple's Mail.
To be serious for a moment, Pine does actually let you use an alternate editor of your choice instead of the default pico. |
SearchFrom our Sponsor...Latest Mountain Lion HintsWhat's New:Hints1 new Hints in the last 24 hoursComments last 2 daysNo new commentsLinks last 2 weeksNo recent new linksWhat's New in the Forums?
Hints by TopicNews from Macworld
From Our Sponsors |
|
Copyright © 2014 IDG Consumer & SMB (Privacy Policy) Contact Us All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners. |
Visit other IDG sites: |
|
|
|
Created this page in 0.13 seconds |
|