|
|
Surprised no one has replied to this…
You would lose quality in both the cd burning case and in the ahp case. When the music is burned to CD the aac is converted to wav in the decoding process in order to be burned. The reimport is obviously then of lower quality of the original. In the AHP case, the aac is still being decoded when played through the computer, even though it's not being burned. So the aac>wav>mp3 will still result in quality loss. I don't think there is any way to avoid this in any case.
Surprised no one has replied to this…
Why is it of lower quality? If you burn a CD, then import in the same format and bit rate, the quality should be the same. The algorithm for compressing the music doesn't change...
Surprised no one has replied to this…
That's exactly the point. When the aac was first ripped at wherever Apple rips its music, it used an algorithm(codec) to compress the cd to aac. That in itself result in quality loss because the algorithm inherently removes data from the original wave. That's why an aac is much smaller than the original wave. When you burn that aac to a cd and rip it again, it loses even MORE data since youre using a similar algorithm again. The original data lost is not recoverable. Everytime you rerip you're losing more and more data. That's why people try to stay away from reencodes of files already encoded in the first place.
Surprised no one has replied to this…
This is strictly accurate, but the argument against recompression is easily overstated. |
SearchFrom our Sponsor...Latest Mountain Lion HintsWhat's New:HintsNo new hintsComments last 2 daysNo new commentsLinks last 2 weeksNo recent new linksWhat's New in the Forums?
Hints by TopicNews from Macworld
From Our Sponsors |
|
Copyright © 2014 IDG Consumer & SMB (Privacy Policy) Contact Us All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners. |
Visit other IDG sites: |
|
|
|
Created this page in 0.14 seconds |
|