|
|
10.4: Recover from a 'disappearing' pico/nano
Have seen this quite a bit. For me, it was a good reason to switch primarily to vi, which is a much safer editor for most tasks (that is, it handles line breaks, etc. better than nano/pico).
10.4: Recover from a 'disappearing' pico/nano
What's wrong with 'dd' ?
10.4: Recover from a 'disappearing' pico/nano
... or cat...?
10.4: Switch to vi instead
That exact behaviour of pico (-> nano) made me finally switch to vi. And good it was I did. vi takes a little practise to get used to, but in the end it's much more powerful than pico.
10.4: Recover from a 'disappearing' pico/nano
What do you mean by line breaks? Try using the -w argument with pico and see if it handles line breaks to your liking.
|
SearchFrom our Sponsor...Latest Mountain Lion HintsWhat's New:HintsNo new hintsComments last 2 daysLinks last 2 weeksNo recent new linksWhat's New in the Forums?
Hints by TopicNews from Macworld
From Our Sponsors |
|
Copyright © 2014 IDG Consumer & SMB (Privacy Policy) Contact Us All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners. |
Visit other IDG sites: |
|
|
|
Created this page in 0.08 seconds |
|