Submit Hint Search The Forums LinksStatsPollsHeadlinesRSS
14,000 hints and counting!


Click here to return to the 'Didn't they already release the Cube? Now it's back with a new name?' hint
The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. This site is not responsible for what they say.
Didn't they already release the Cube? Now it's back with a new name?
Authored by: digiglyphics on Jan 14, '05 10:58:28PM

Sorry gang, but I say no! I love apple but they got me with the cube. I swore that would be the last time I bought an all-in-one box. It's what's kept me away from imacs as well. I think there great and all but if you plan to expand these things are just not for you. My $.02!

---
http://www.digiglyphics.com



[ Reply to This | # ]
Didn't they already release the Cube? Now it's back with a new name?
Authored by: Thom on Jan 24, '05 12:24:27PM
That's funny, because I distinctly remember installing a new PowerLogix clear case on a Cube and moving the power conversion board, so I could upgrade the video card. There are three RAM slots for upgrading memory, and there are whole motherboard replacements for processor upgrades, superdrives that fit (and are Apple software compatible), etc. See Cubeowner.com for more details about all the possible upgrades - these are but a few.

My guess is, the Mini was not engineered to be like the Cube was at all. So, yes, you're very right in understanding that the Mac Mini probably won't have much of an upgrade path. You can get low cost, and/or high quality features, and/or upgradeability: pick two out of three. If you want a more expandable machine, get a PowerMac G5, that's what the larger case is for. Just don't talk smack about the Cube, because they're still around and people still love them to death.

Here is an interesting comparison:
GlennLog Cube vs. Mini Feature Comparison. He doesn't talk about installed VRAM (I think it doubled in the Mini) but otherwise it's pretty on the mark.

[ Reply to This | # ]