Submit Hint Search The Forums LinksStatsPollsHeadlinesRSS
14,000 hints and counting!

Click here to return to the 'Install a Flash-controlling extension in Camino' hint
The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. This site is not responsible for what they say.
Install a Flash-controlling extension in Camino
Authored by: raider on Dec 20, '04 12:18:35PM
There are a couple differences actually. One is strictly cosmetic. Flashblock just looks better. :)

But the solution you are referring to, I tried first. The problem is that in order to use it, your CSS has to refer to some javascript that is supposedly hosted here:

But that site actually redirects you to here:

So I figured, hey - I could just store the xml file (which holds javascript) locally. Nope. There is a bug in the 'zilla browsers (related to security constraints) that you can't refer to a local file in your CSS embedding. So all you could do is locate it on an http server locally, which would be a waste - in my opinion.

Flashblock seems to be a cleaner solution. As far as I can tell (I might have missed something, since I just looked through quickly) Flashblock does everything locally....

[ Reply to This | # ]