Submit Hint Search The Forums LinksStatsPollsHeadlinesRSS
14,000 hints and counting!


Click here to return to the 'Dual AMD Athlon MP 1.2GHz with 512MB' hint
The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. This site is not responsible for what they say.
Dual AMD Athlon MP 1.2GHz with 512MB
Authored by: sodre on Jan 13, '02 08:08:02PM
Okay... It is good to know that my US$ 1,300 performs a hell lot faster then the Dual 800 G4. It probably means that for server purposes and raw number crunching, the Athlons are doing -much- better.
                  sign    verify    sign/s verify/s
rsa 512 bits 0.0009s 0.0001s 1058.7 12818.3
rsa 1024 bits 0.0045s 0.0002s 219.9 4391.6
rsa 2048 bits 0.0266s 0.0008s 37.5 1314.3
rsa 4096 bits 0.1775s 0.0027s 5.6 371.8
sign verify sign/s verify/s
dsa 512 bits 0.0008s 0.0010s 1223.1 1000.2
dsa 1024 bits 0.0023s 0.0027s 440.8 371.4
dsa 2048 bits 0.0074s 0.0090s 135.1 110.6


[ Reply to This | # ]
Dual AMD Athlon MP 1.2GHz with 512MB
Authored by: pelorus on Jan 14, '02 05:45:51AM
Important to note that the dual Proc machines will show results running on a single processor only. You'd have to run it twice at the same time to get benefits of dual processing.

this is my Powerbook G3/400 with 384 MB RAM

                  sign    verify    sign/s verify/s

rsa 512 bits 0.0074s 0.0007s 135.3 1380.3
rsa 1024 bits 0.0444s 0.0025s 22.5 405.5
rsa 2048 bits 0.2991s 0.0091s 3.3 109.4
rsa 4096 bits 2.1075s 0.0329s 0.5 30.4
sign verify sign/s verify/s
dsa 512 bits 0.0072s 0.0091s 138.0 109.6
dsa 1024 bits 0.0234s 0.0305s 42.7 32.7
dsa 2048 bits 0.0919s 0.1069s 10.9 9.4



[ Reply to This | # ]
Dual AMD Athlon MP 1.2GHz with 512MB
Authored by: kransta on Mar 28, '02 10:50:25PM

DP500G4, 1.5RAM. 10.1.3 these are my results
sign verify sign/s verify/s
rsa 512 bits 0.0058s 0.0006s 173.6 1757.2
rsa 1024 bits 0.0344s 0.0019s 29.1 525.4
rsa 2048 bits 0.2323s 0.0071s 4.3 141.5
rsa 4096 bits 1.6329s 0.0263s 0.6 38.0
sign verify sign/s verify/s
dsa 512 bits 0.0055s 0.0068s 180.2 146.3
dsa 1024 bits 0.0191s 0.0228s 52.4 43.9
dsa 2048 bits 0.0682s 0.0834s 14.7 12.0

Slower machines get comparable results, does my machine suck?
You said to run the test twice to realize the DP power, how do ou do this?

Thanks

Kransta



[ Reply to This | # ]