|
|
Speaking of sh and bash...
Am I the only one bothered when you see a unix system with a bash in sh's clothing? Meaning there's a bash in place of sh?
Speaking of sh and bash...
If you read the man page for bash, you'll find that it behaves differently when invoked as "sh" than when invoked as "bash". The behavior in "sh" invocation closely mimics the original sh.
Speaking of sh and bash...
*sigh*.. fyi, i've rtfm before, have you?
Speaking of sh and bash...
I recall AIX utilizing a ksh as sh; I recall HP-UX providing restricted and Bourne or sh-Posix modes. |
SearchFrom our Sponsor...Latest Mountain Lion HintsWhat's New:HintsNo new hintsComments last 2 daysLinks last 2 weeksNo recent new linksWhat's New in the Forums?
Hints by TopicNews from Macworld
From Our Sponsors |
|
Copyright © 2014 IDG Consumer & SMB (Privacy Policy) Contact Us All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners. |
Visit other IDG sites: |
|
|
|
Created this page in 0.09 seconds |
|