|
|
Speed up SMB (Samba) server performance
Should these options be used instead of everything in the originial post, or should we still use "read size" and "getwd cache" as well as the new "socket options"? That is, should we use the following:
Speed up SMB (Samba) server performance
I bumped the "read size" to 16384, as well. This value needs to be selected with some intelligence. I experimented with values like 4096, 8012 until things "felt" right. One should really measure the throughput properly when tweaking this value. See this Samba performance tuning reference. 16K is a pretty standard setting for BSD boxes. I did not change the "getcwd cache" value from it's default . According to Using Samba: This global option specifies whether Samba should use a local cache for the Unix getwd() ( get current working directory) system call. You can override the default value of yes as follows: I've never noticed a problem accessing [homes] for any of my users. |
SearchFrom our Sponsor...Latest Mountain Lion HintsWhat's New:HintsNo new hintsComments last 2 daysLinks last 2 weeksNo recent new linksWhat's New in the Forums?
Hints by TopicNews from Macworld
From Our Sponsors |
|
Copyright © 2014 IDG Consumer & SMB (Privacy Policy) Contact Us All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners. |
Visit other IDG sites: |
|
|
|
Created this page in 0.10 seconds |
|