Submit Hint Search The Forums LinksStatsPollsHeadlinesRSS
14,000 hints and counting!

Click here to return to the 'And so the deMacification continues...' hint
The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. This site is not responsible for what they say.
And so the deMacification continues...
Authored by: ashill on Nov 05, '01 10:46:39AM

Apple made a major mistake. It was completely their fault, which they publicly acknowledged very quickly. They released a fix very quickly.

This is in no way an apology for an egregious and one might even say negligent mistake on their part, but bugs do happen in programs, particularly in installers. Bugs like this can happen in OS 9 installers; the difference is that we can read the shell scripts for this particular OS X installer and figure out exactly what went wrong. I personally find it interesting to investigate the cause of the bug, but I do not believe that it is the end user's responsibility to know what bit them.

I use spaces in my volume names and in my file names. It is rare that Mac OS X causes problems because of spaces in file names; when it does, it's a bug that needs to be corrected, and has been corrected promptly by Apple.

If you do stuff in a shell on a regular basis, it can be a pain to have files with spaces in them. Therefore, I try to avoid using spaces in files that I regularly access from the terminal. However, if you don't use the terminal (much), there should be no need to worry about spaces, and usually, there is no need to worry about spaces.

I don't speak for this forum, but I am sympathetic to anyone who was bitten by this bug, and I am impressed by Apple's response (although I am not impressed by their testing prior to release). I wish I could be helpful, rather than simply understand what went wrong, but I can't.

Regarding file-case sensitivity on UFS: HFS+ is the default file system, and it behaves exactly like OS 9 with regards to file-case sensitivity: it is case-preserving, but not case-sensitive. File name extensions are not a Unix concept, they're a dumb Windows concept that Apple is sorely mistaken in adopting (IMHO).

No one is saying that we should all learn the Unix way. I am learning the Unix way because I think it's fun, and because I use Solaris (Sun's version of Unix) boxes in the astronomy lab in which I work. It is Apple's publicly stated position that any problem in OS X that requires Unix knowledge to fix is an unresolved bug; for the most part, they have lived up to that promise (including with this iTunes debacle; it could just have well have been a bug in compiled code, as far as Apple's fix is concerned). Sometimes, those of us with Unix knowledge can fix a problem before Apple releases a fix, but that doesn't mean that Apple is forcing users to learn the Unix way; non-Unix-saavy users will have to wait as long (and no longer) than they did for a fix for a similar problem in OS 9.

-Alex Hill

[ Reply to This | # ]
And so the deMacification continues...
Authored by: Brad Puett on Nov 05, '01 01:56:13PM

The main problem I have with this whole "mistake" is that, for at least some of us, it' not fixed!! if I try to install iTunes 2.01 now, as soon as it reboots fromthe installation, I'm left with the "smiley mac face" starign at me from the screen, NO cursor at all, and a freeze that lasts until I force a hardware reset, and then force a PRAM reset, just to get back into 9.2.1!! I'm sorry, but this unacceptable!!

Especially since I'm getting a LOT more errors (roughly 10x) in my log files, plus 2 kernel panics (of which I have never had before this "installation"), which I can never get out of unless I force a hardware reset!!

In order to recover from the "installation", I had to:
a) Hardware reset (i.e. "paperclip")
b) PRAM reset (in order to allow me to boot into 9.2.1)
c) Delete everythig related to "iTune" on the "X" partition ...
d) Reinstall 10.1, using the 10.1 update CD
e) Boot (finally!) into 10.1, go to System Preferences, go to Login, and delete off the iTuneHelper program that was still selected (even though it didn't exist!)

Here's just 2 examples of the messages I'm now still getting:

Nov 5 12:34:02 localhost kextd[41]: loading module:
Nov 5 12:34:03 localhost kextd[41]: loading module:
Nov 5 12:34:04 localhost mach_kernel: USB: 3669.929: [0x16F7600] USB Generic Mouse @ 4 (0x14130000)

Nov 5 12:39:15 localhost mach_kernel: USB: 3980.904: AppleUSBHub[0x16B7A00]::stop - trying command sleep (0/1).
Nov 5 12:39:15 localhost mach_kernel: USB: 3980.960: [0x16F7600] USB Generic Hub @ 3 (0x14100000)
Nov 5 12:39:15 localhost kextd[41]: loading module:
Nov 5 12:39:15 localhost kextd[41]: loading module:
Nov 5 12:39:16 localhost mach_kernel: USB: 3982.276: [0x206CC00] USB Generic Mouse @ 5 (0x14130000)
Nov 5 12:39:16 localhost mach_kernel: USB: 3982.277: [0x16D1000] USB Generic Keyboard @ 4 (0x14110000)
Nov 5 12:39:25 localhost mach_kernel: USB: 3990.751: AppleUSBHub[0x16B7A00]::CheckForDeadHub - calling commandWakeup
Nov 5 12:39:25 localhost mach_kernel: USB: 3990.752: AppleUSBHub[0x16B7A00]::stop - returned from command sleep (0,0)!!

I realize that more than a few people lost data, but what has me temporarily upset is that I've been given the impression by the major Mac Sites that the iTunes 2.01 package *fixed* all the problems, and Apple is no longer working on a solution! It's not fixed for some of us!!

(Sorry, but it's been a *very* frustrating weekend ...)

[ Reply to This | # ]