Submit Hint Search The Forums LinksStatsPollsHeadlinesRSS
14,000 hints and counting!


Click here to return to the 'James is good, if you can handle the wait' hint
The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. This site is not responsible for what they say.
James is good, if you can handle the wait
Authored by: swankjesse on Nov 07, '03 01:05:17PM

I've been using James for a while. And I do like a lot of things about it - especially Java, database storage and maillets.

But I've found that the performance just isn't there. For my small server James is sucking up 84 MB of RAM. And although I attempted to optimize it I've had very limited success.

Has anyone else tried James? Perhaps there's some magic to get it working quickly. FYI, my server is a Linux/XBox with James 2.1.3 running 10 users in a dbfile repository.



[ Reply to This | # ]