Submit Hint Search The Forums LinksStatsPollsHeadlinesRSS
14,000 hints and counting!


Click here to return to the 'Is it overkill?' hint
The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. This site is not responsible for what they say.
Is it overkill?
Authored by: repetty on Oct 29, '03 11:04:43PM

No, more than once is not overkill. Super-duper computer forensics labs can "see through" single writes without too much problem. You've got to do it several times to really give these guys a real problem.

I just as intrigued, though, by the fact that it's really easy to read letters without opening envelopes, even correspondence which has be folder over serveral times and placed in a "secure" envelope.

No, my friend, you've got to overwrite many times to approach secure, and even then there are no guarrantees against the most motivited government agencies.

--Richard



[ Reply to This | # ]
Is it overkill?
Authored by: zacht on Oct 30, '03 01:08:46PM

I once saw a post on Usenet claiming that all the data of the entire federal government is kept on a single 20 MB hard disk. They keep overwriting the data, but the FBI/CIA/NSA can read down through the "layers", so no problem...

A silly joke, of course...

Seriously, reading overwritten data is possible because each little section of disk that's supposed to be a 0 or 1 actually has many magnetic grains in it. Writing a 0 or 1 will flip most, but never all, of the grains. FBI & co. can look at something that seems to be, say, all 0's, and detect residual 1's at certain spots---grains that didn't make the switch to 0's---, and from that, recover a lot of the original data.

I think this can be done with certain types of microscopes---atomic force microscope (AFM) maybe? I forget---if you happen to have one lying around... :-)

Anyway, if you overwrite seven times, it's supposed to be unlikely that any individual grain would stay unchanged seven times in a row.



[ Reply to This | # ]