|
|
Umm, didn't we leave this behind with OS9?
WTF? "System Instability"?!?!? Why the hell should any instability be the result? Disk thrashing, sure. That I understand, but crashing? Why would this be excusable?
instability
"instability" does not equate to "crashing"
Umm, didn't we leave this behind with OS9?
..and why give the option of 75%+ if it causes problems?!?! just stop at 75% and call it 100% or Lots or something
Umm, didn't we leave this behind with OS9?
Unix manages memory and process priority better than classic but still allows users & programs to overide default allocation (indead one of my first open systems classes they showed us how to use these to kill unix stone dead) |
SearchFrom our Sponsor...Latest Mountain Lion HintsWhat's New:HintsNo new hintsComments last 2 daysNo new commentsLinks last 2 weeksNo recent new linksWhat's New in the Forums?
Hints by TopicNews from Macworld
From Our Sponsors |
|
Copyright © 2014 IDG Consumer & SMB (Privacy Policy) Contact Us All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners. |
Visit other IDG sites: |
|
|
|
Created this page in 0.18 seconds |
|