Submit Hint Search The Forums LinksStatsPollsHeadlinesRSS
14,000 hints and counting!


Click here to return to the 'LPR just doesn't work for me...' hint
The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. This site is not responsible for what they say.
LPR just doesn't work for me...
Authored by: jtrascap on Aug 30, '01 04:40:46AM

I don't know what it is, but LPR just won't run. Files seems like they're printing, but they end up in a dead queue when I look at the logs.

I'm running over a Novell network, but I thought attaching to the IP would take care of that.

Any ideas, anyone??



[ Reply to This | # ]
LPR just doesn't work for me...
Authored by: adriaant on Aug 30, '01 10:17:23PM
Take a look at this site. It explains how to set up LPR printing for network printers. Good luck!

[ Reply to This | # ]
LPR with non-PostScript printer?
Authored by: mike3k on Sep 17, '01 03:47:46PM
Is there any way I can get LPR printing working (or otherwise print from console or XFree86 apps) with a supported USB printer, such as my Canon S600?


I'd also like to be able to get printer sharing to work, so I can print wirelessly from my iBook as I can now do with printer sharing under classic? I'd rather not be running classic on my G3 because it slows it down too much.


[ Reply to This | # ]

LPR with non-PostScript printer?
Authored by: adriaant on Sep 18, '01 12:23:53AM
Some folks tried my LPR set up instructions at www.tijsseling.com/professional/xtipstop.html for USB printers and it did work for them. Try it out.

[ Reply to This | # ]
LPR just doesn't work for me...
Authored by: sunsoul on Dec 03, '01 04:56:11PM

Excuse my newbism, but how do you know or set your laserprinter's IP address ?
this would really help me to increase my printing speed !
i would like to set my LW IIg to talk to my network via IP; in order to do it, i need to add it in Print Center via IP... and then, i need to know my printer's IP address, which my newbism wont let me know ;)

THX



[ Reply to This | # ]
LPR just doesn't work for me...
Authored by: markt on Jan 03, '02 12:10:50PM

I am still looking for a simple explanation to the problems you are encountering. I have three laser printers on a network. 2 of them are HP printers with the same IP address so I can't seem to print to one of them. The other is a LexMark M410 which allegedly allows me to change the address but I keep getting a message that there is a problem with the address I gave it.

Therefore, there must be some secret to what numbers a printer can have, and conversely, there must be some secret to how you can change the IP numbers on an HP 8000N.

I sure haven't found it yet.

One of these days, someone will give us a clear, non-techy answer to these problems. As for now, I can barely print and have a pretty hard time getting my OSX to connect to my network.

At this point, it all seems like dark arts and witchcraft. But like I said, someday, someone will offer us a clear, step-by-step process that will get us up and running ... in the meantime, don't we non-techy's just long for the days when all we had to do was select a printer or server via the chooser?



[ Reply to This | # ]
LPR just doesn't work for me...
Authored by: mooboynyc on Dec 05, '03 07:16:24AM

TCP/IP rule #1: 2 devices cannot have the same IP address.



[ Reply to This | # ]
LPR just doesn't work for me...
Authored by: hope on Mar 18, '04 07:19:46PM

I have a LW IIg also, and I tried all sorts of tricks to enable IP printing. It boils down to, this printer expects AppleTalk jobs, and it's not going to talk IP.

Less boiling: I work in networking, and I tried adding a static ARP entry to assign an IP address, and then I read the manual that it doesn't have a network stack so it just doesn't talk IP. The Ethernet cable threw me off too -- I probably should have started with the manual! I haven't given up hope, but I am using another printer now so I'm not looking hard. CUPS is remarkable, and atprint should be able to handle it too. However, if you're a newbie (don't like the looks of Terminal for "man atprint") or just plain busy (me), a new printer would be the faster solution. Sorry.



[ Reply to This | # ]