|
|
Why?
Why not just use a vnc client of mac os x and just skip using X11 at all? Seems ridiculous to use X at all if you are using vnc anyways.
Why?
Just try running an X Window System session over a slow link and you'll
Why?
I used StarOffice 5.2 over a 33.6 modem connection with x11 tunneled through ssh with maximum compression. it took a while to load all damn toolbar icons, but after that I was able to work with StarOffice like with a local application! Scrolling, typing etc., everything was smooth. Toolbar switching took some time though :).
Why?
Being a Mac- & Unix-only guy, I don't have any experience with PC
Huh?
I've read all the comments and I still don't understand why you would use vnc for LOCALHOST connection? sounds unnecessary.
Huh?
Like I said, it keeps your X11 session seperate from your X
Huh?
Ah! Sorry, I have just realised what you meant.
Why?
X11 rocks. VNC rocks. Depends on what you need and why. I happen to agree with you about X11, but VNC truly rocks.
Why?
For you people who still don't get this, think like the way Windows uses Terminal Services and the concept of workspaces. |
SearchFrom our Sponsor...Latest Mountain Lion HintsWhat's New:HintsNo new hintsComments last 2 daysNo new commentsLinks last 2 weeksNo recent new linksWhat's New in the Forums?
Hints by TopicNews from Macworld
From Our Sponsors |
|
Copyright © 2014 IDG Consumer & SMB (Privacy Policy) Contact Us All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners. |
Visit other IDG sites: |
|
|
|
Created this page in 0.30 seconds |
|