|
|
it *should* have been done that way
good response ... although, software development is an entirely different thing
there isn't much gain in having a single book that covers all the bases over a group of books that covers all the bases ... but having a single application that covers all the bases is essential because it contributes to overall productivity, ability, and ease of use imagine having one web browser that displays the text and jpgs of a web page ... and another web browser that displays the text and gifs of a web page or even worse ... having one powerful app to list the files and attributes in a directory, and another that offers different attributes but is much less powerful ... thus forcing every listing of a directory to be %ls followed by %lsmac ... this is not simple, elegant, nor intuitive having multiple (overlapping and/or redundant) books is simply not comparable since the purpose of philosophy books is to explain concepts/ideas/rationale rather than rotely format and organize information in a "simple" and "quick" manner |
SearchFrom our Sponsor...Latest Mountain Lion HintsWhat's New:HintsNo new hintsComments last 2 daysNo new commentsLinks last 2 weeksNo recent new linksWhat's New in the Forums?
Hints by TopicNews from Macworld
From Our Sponsors |
|
Copyright © 2014 IDG Consumer & SMB (Privacy Policy) Contact Us All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners. |
Visit other IDG sites: |
|
|
|
Created this page in 0.09 seconds |
|