Submit Hint Search The Forums LinksStatsPollsHeadlinesRSS
14,000 hints and counting!


Click here to return to the 'it *should* have been done that way' hint
The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. This site is not responsible for what they say.
it *should* have been done that way
Authored by: semios on Apr 10, '03 02:38:59PM

I guess you would also claim that there are far too many books on philosophy in the library? There is absolutely no reason for all those books.



[ Reply to This | # ]
it *should* have been done that way
Authored by: sgi_oh_too on Apr 11, '03 12:27:53AM
good response ... although, software development is an entirely different thing

there isn't much gain in having a single book that covers all the bases over a group of books that covers all the bases ... but having a single application that covers all the bases is essential because it contributes to overall productivity, ability, and ease of use

imagine having one web browser that displays the text and jpgs of a web page ... and another web browser that displays the text and gifs of a web page

or even worse ... having one powerful app to list the files and attributes in a directory, and another that offers different attributes but is much less powerful ... thus forcing every listing of a directory to be %ls followed by %lsmac ... this is not simple, elegant, nor intuitive

having multiple (overlapping and/or redundant) books is simply not comparable since the purpose of philosophy books is to explain concepts/ideas/rationale rather than rotely format and organize information in a "simple" and "quick" manner

[ Reply to This | # ]