|
|
Can do, but why?
Dunno if it's kool or not, but why would somebody want to lose Acrobat's various features that are tuned to viewing PDF's? Like side-by-side pages and other layout-aware formats, easy zooming, bookmark/thumbnail smarts, ... ?
Can do, but why?
FYI, the official Swiss Army Knife has no corkscrew.
Re: Can do, but why?
As far as I know, PDF rendering is built into the Quartz engine. That's why Preview, a 1.6 MB app, can render them, and Safari too. So it's not really bloatware if the functionality is system-wide, and not an inflated app.
Re: Can do, but why?
let's see here, on my system, Safari comes in at ~7 MB. Acrobat Reader, on the other hand, tips the scales at 77.4 MB (wait, that can't be right... ...holy sh**, Acrobat READER is 77 MB, and I'm not even talking about the full Acrobat). Now that's B L O A T W A R E. Thanks, but anything that takes 77 MB, and is that slow, I'm gonna replace with Safari. Good tip, thanks. |
SearchFrom our Sponsor...Latest Mountain Lion HintsWhat's New:HintsNo new hintsComments last 2 daysLinks last 2 weeksNo recent new linksWhat's New in the Forums?
Hints by TopicNews from Macworld
From Our Sponsors |
|
Copyright © 2014 IDG Consumer & SMB (Privacy Policy) Contact Us All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners. |
Visit other IDG sites: |
|
|
|
Created this page in 0.14 seconds |
|