|
|
Difference between batch and &
Is there any difference between using batch and using the "&" postfix in bash?
Difference between batch and &
I haven't used unix stuff for long enough so I don't know but I think that when you use & you still own it. If I read it correctly, this method runs things as root which means your user doesn't have to be logged in.
Difference between batch and &
It doesn't run the command 'as root' but rather the userid that executed the command. It also retains things like environment variables and current working directory
From the manpage: For both at and batch, the working directory, environment (except for the
Difference between batch and &
The `batch` command does one other important thing which using the ampersand operater can not...
Difference between batch and &
Using & executes right away, rather than, say, updating fink at 3:00AM when you won't miss the extra CPU cycles. |
SearchFrom our Sponsor...Latest Mountain Lion HintsWhat's New:HintsNo new hintsComments last 2 daysNo new commentsLinks last 2 weeksNo recent new linksWhat's New in the Forums?
Hints by TopicNews from Macworld
From Our Sponsors |
|
Copyright © 2014 IDG Consumer & SMB (Privacy Policy) Contact Us All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners. |
Visit other IDG sites: |
|
|
|
Created this page in 0.09 seconds |
|