Submit Hint Search The Forums LinksStatsPollsHeadlinesRSS
14,000 hints and counting!


Click here to return to the 'Chaining vs. direct connect...' hint
The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. This site is not responsible for what they say.
Chaining vs. direct connect...
Authored by: Mikey-San on Jan 16, '03 02:26:55PM

FireWire "termination" exists. It is not outdated SCSI terminology. The difference here is that it's done /automatically/ in FireWire, all the time. The extra two pins on your FW port (vs your PC friends' crappy 4-pin FW ports) are for termination power.

Yes, you're supposed to disconnect the cable from the FireWire controller first (read: TEH COMPUTAR!!1); no, there is nothing special about the cable that comes with the iPod; and no, not all chain pass-through ports suck. As a matter of fact, the ports on my LaCie FireWire drive kick much ass.


-/-



[ Reply to This | # ]
Chaining vs. direct connect...
Authored by: imageworx on Jan 16, '03 04:11:26PM

I am looking at the back of my Qksilver 800 and I have one wired (not connected) and another (chained to two CDRs and a DVDRAM). Never have bootup or corruption issues.
Might be isolated incident.

Then again, I have all Granite Digital FW cables with the bright green LED.

"Remember-don't ever force the FW cable into the slot. Someone one did and friend their board and drive" +20volts can be bad...



[ Reply to This | # ]
Chaining vs. direct connect...
Authored by: timbloom on Jan 20, '03 06:46:50PM

Those 2 pins you see there are the 12V power coming from the CPU that charges your ipod and keeps bus powered devices running. Firewire does not need "termination" in the sense of scsi because it is a serial- based interface.



[ Reply to This | # ]