|
|
UFS v HFS+ caution
While UFS has its uses I feel its probably not a good general recommendation for users switching to mac. In my view the primary needs UFS occur in two situations, one is if the mac is working as a disk server to Linux/sun/unix computers. There OS independent transparency to the external world may have priority. (indeed my xserves export their UFS partitions for this reason) The other is the rare case where the users are porting unix packages in such a wholsale fashion that they cannot anticiapte or correct name capitalization problems. In most circumstances, correcting filename capitalization is just one of many porting issues one needs to address, but not a good reason to abandon HFS+. |
SearchFrom our Sponsor...Latest Mountain Lion HintsWhat's New:HintsNo new hintsComments last 2 daysLinks last 2 weeksNo recent new linksWhat's New in the Forums?
Hints by TopicNews from Macworld
From Our Sponsors |
|
Copyright © 2014 IDG Consumer & SMB (Privacy Policy) Contact Us All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners. |
Visit other IDG sites: |
|
|
|
Created this page in 0.09 seconds |
|