Submit Hint Search The Forums LinksStatsPollsHeadlinesRSS
14,000 hints and counting!


UFS v HFS+ | 45 comments | Create New Account
Click here to return to the 'UFS v HFS+' hint
The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. This site is not responsible for what they say.
UFS v HFS+
Authored by: ewan on Jan 01, '03 11:35:12AM

Then again, if like me, you are a unix user you probably have no need for OS9.
I did consider the whole OS9/Classic thing but realised there were no reasons to have it - it's not as if unix switchers have OS9 software they wish to keep using and getting rid of OS9 frees up another gig or so of disk space.
There is also experimental support for rw on ufs in the newer linux kernels which would be an advantage if you wanted to dual boot. The only issue I'm not clear on is if Mac on Linux would work with ufs.
So far (3 months) UFS has served me nicely with none of the afformentioned issues about cp/tar etc.



[ Reply to This | # ]