Submit Hint Search The Forums LinksStatsPollsHeadlinesRSS
14,000 hints and counting!

Click here to return to the 'Nothing Happens?' hint
The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. This site is not responsible for what they say.
Nothing Happens?
Authored by: todd3039 on Dec 17, '02 10:33:44AM

I too have tried all of the previous without luck.

Here is my setup:

Powerbook G4 SD w/ 10.2.2
Installed Gimp_Print
Activated SAMBA option

Windows XP machine
Sharing is on
Printer sharing is on as well
Epson Photo 750 USB printer

I've tried every possible combination URI address. If I use "smb://workgroup;username@machinename/share" the Print Center actually spools and it looks like it should begin printing but nothing happens on the Windows machine. I'm obviously overlooking something. Please help!

[ Reply to This | # ]
This worked for me:
Authored by: james_sorenson on Dec 17, '02 01:01:31PM

Okay, this is what I use, and it enables me to print to a non-postscript, laserjet connected by parellel-port to a Windows 2000pro machine protected by password (phew!).


The sharename is the printer's "Shared as" name listed in the printer's properties. I have the latest Gimp-Print installed with the Ghostscript interpreter as well. I didn't have to do any work in the terminal.

I hope this helps some of you guys!


[ Reply to This | # ]
Nothing Happens?
Authored by: todd3039 on Dec 17, '02 03:26:06PM

I got it! I just needed to upgrade my gimp-print to 4.2.4! Thanks everyone!

[ Reply to This | # ]
Nothing Happens?
Authored by: compete12 on Dec 17, '02 04:23:53PM

I've been wanting to do this (windows printing via an iMac) for quite some time. Today, I was able to connect my iMac to my WinXP shared HP LaserJet 1100 (I used the pcl-6 driver), and I'm able to print stuff out of Netscape just fine, but it botches up when I try to use APPLEWORKS 6. Any ideas?
I have the latest Gimp-Print, and Ghostscript installed.

BTW, I used the:
nomenclature that I read off of james_sorenson's post, and it worked just fine.

Macs rule.


[ Reply to This | # ]