|
|
Re: Can't help with HFS/UFS, but...
i'm happy to hear that a normal install takes a couple of minutes. i imagine that installing to the HFS disk image slowed it down.
Re: Can't help with HFS/UFS, but...
Why do you say that? Almost everything I've read that is official from Apple basically states that HFS+ should be used for a Mac OS X install unless you are using it as a server, and that some programs will not operate under UFS.
HFS vs. UFS
UFS is compatible with Unix apps. It is case sensitive. This permits me to build a ton of Unix apps, and lets me easily integrate with Linux and nfs environments. Life is much easier when all of my machines offer the same file system semantics.
HFS vs. UFS
Have you considered having two partitions, with two different file systems?
HFS vs. UFS
Soft updates are not something that Darwin's implementation supports from what I have read. I saw something earlier on that indicated that they were trying to improve the UFS implementation. But, I could be wrong of course.
HFS vs. UFS
A small HFS partition probably wouldn't be a bad idea. Howevver, it probably wouldn't fix the problem: |
SearchFrom our Sponsor...Latest Mountain Lion HintsWhat's New:HintsNo new hintsComments last 2 daysLinks last 2 weeksNo recent new linksWhat's New in the Forums?
Hints by TopicNews from Macworld
From Our Sponsors |
|
Copyright © 2014 IDG Consumer & SMB (Privacy Policy) Contact Us All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners. |
Visit other IDG sites: |
|
|
|
Created this page in 0.10 seconds |
|