Submit Hint Search The Forums LinksStatsPollsHeadlinesRSS
14,000 hints and counting!


Click here to return to the 'Adding artwork to a radio stream in iTunes' hint
The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. This site is not responsible for what they say.
Adding artwork to a radio stream in iTunes
Authored by: chucky23 on Jun 25, '10 05:41:02PM

"You may wish to re-explore Home Sharing; if you use the identical itunes login/password, all items (AKAIK), be they AAC, MP3, Protected AAC, etc., will all be accessible from any machine."

iTunes will sync non-Apple Store media across machines if they are all logged into the same Apple Store account?

I thought that wasn't true, and so never even tried. If so, good on Apple. And I learn something new every day.



[ Reply to This | # ]
Adding artwork to a radio stream in iTunes
Authored by: leamanc on Jun 28, '10 01:50:09AM

Yes, it is true. The initial internet furor over the issue was because each machine had to be authorized to the same iTunes account, and had the same limitation of authorized machines as iTunes purchases (5 machines). But make no mistake, as long as the machines are on the same iTunes account, it will sync everything you like between machines, with some very nice options (by artist, by album, etc.).

All this moaning about Apple not doing this or that with iTunes or OS X in general is BS. They come up with cool new stuff all the time in both of them. The pace of development is much faster than in the old classic OS days, and much, much faster than Windows. Linux may introduce neat stuff at a faster clip, but they've got thousands of people working on that around the globe.



[ Reply to This | # ]
Adding artwork to a radio stream in iTunes
Authored by: chucky23 on Jun 28, '10 07:23:28AM

"All this moaning about Apple not doing this or that with iTunes or OS X in general is BS. They come up with cool new stuff all the time in both of them. The pace of development is much faster than in the old classic OS days, and much, much faster than Windows."

It's been 3 years since we've had any (non-bug fix) development on OS X.

It's been 5 years since we've had any development in the general topic of this thread - folks using a Mac as a lean-back HTPC system, or even as an desktop iTunes playback system with a visual backdrop component.

And it's not just a matter of engineers. Apple could solve the "add artwork to streams and mpgs" conundrum if they put two engineers on it for a week.. And considering the amount of work Apple has put into Back Row, it wouldn't take Apple much work at all to simply port some of that into Front Row.

But, as stated, it feels a lot like pretty much all of OS X is has been a discontinued OS at this point for 3 years now. We'll (hopefully) get one more maintenance release in 2011 or 2012, and then what?

I avoided learning Windows even during the dark days of the mid-to-late 90's. But now I've finally put a Windows 7 boot camp partition on my machine to start getting up to speed on the OS I guess I'll need to be using if I want a full-fledged computer 4 years from now.

Apple seems to have made a decision that this is 1984, and OS X is the Apple II.



[ Reply to This | # ]