Submit Hint Search The Forums LinksStatsPollsHeadlinesRSS
14,000 hints and counting!

Click here to return to the 'Mount Ext2/Ext3 Linux volumes in the Finder' hint
The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. This site is not responsible for what they say.
Mount Ext2/Ext3 Linux volumes in the Finder
Authored by: kwanghui on Jan 29, '10 01:13:21PM

I find the easiest and most reliable way to access linux ext3 partitions on my mac is to run Ubuntu in a vmware virtual machine on the mac. Once running you can connect Ubuntu to the ext3 drive via usb, and this way you can get complete reliability reading and writing to ext3 file systems. It's fast because the disk is directly connected to the mac, unlike on a network. And you can use it to copy files very quickly to/from the mac host by using shared directories or any number of other ways.

[ Reply to This | # ]
Mount Ext2/Ext3 Linux volumes in the Finder
Authored by: addn on Jun 08, '10 12:16:39PM

[paraphrased] Nov 16, 2008 9:20 PM
. you cannot use Fusion's VMDKMounter to mount
an ext3/LVM .vmdk virtual disk;
and, any other solution -- if it exists --
has nothing to do with Fusion.
So in the context of using Fusion's VMDKMounter
to mount an ext3/LVM virtual disk
it is not doable, as it is with a Windows NTFS or
FAT32 formated .vmdk virtual hard disk .
. In theory all you have to do is
find a MacFUSE filesystem plugin that handles ext3.
There's an experimental one,
but I don't think it's stable .

if you had vmware workstation for pc ...
. add USB controller to the VM
and plug in the external drive after the VM starts to boot;
add it as a physical disk to the VM
(thats the advanced option in the add disk wizard) .

Mounting ext3 in Snow Leopard? 2009.9
[recent problems]

Fuse-ext2 2010.06/readme.rtf/Bugs
Fuse-ext2 is a EXT2 Filesystem support for FUSE.
. there are no known bugs for read-only mode.
although, write support is available (and it is pretty stable)
please do not mount your filesystems with write support
unless you do not have anything to lose.

[ Reply to This | # ]