Submit Hint Search The Forums LinksStatsPollsHeadlinesRSS
14,000 hints and counting!

Click here to return to the 'An rsync-based backup solution for easy backups' hint
The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. This site is not responsible for what they say.
An rsync-based backup solution for easy backups
Authored by: cayla on Sep 27, '08 11:50:45AM

Can you give me examples of what more I could lose?

The poster below mentioned losing Safari file bookmarks. (I assume they just mean like bookmarks created when you drag a link to the desktop for example and not the internal Safari ones).

Essentially, all I am worried about restoring is actual data. Songs, pictures, text files, movies, etc. Is there that much extra data actually stored in the resource fork? I though OS X was a step away from this?

It probably has more to do with the pokey NAS I use than anything else, but I have noticed that backups take substantially longer when I use the -E flag. It is almost as if rsync can't tell that the information hasn't changed. (Or maybe it has?) Furthermore, it is strange that is takes so long to move 4K of data regardless. (That is how big the NAS shows the resource as. Eg, ._[filename]).

And like you, I was using -aE. Now I just use an -E unless I can be convinced I am losing something valuable.

Thank you both for the responses so far. I appreciate it.

[ Reply to This | # ]
An rsync-based backup solution for easy backups
Authored by: miggins on Sep 28, '08 08:01:47PM